
In matters of statecraft, the search for common ground is a moral imperative.
New Statecraft offers pragmatic policy guidance in federal affairs.
American government must meet the simultaneous challenges of global disinformation campaigns, subversion of democracy, nuclear arms escalation, illegal aggression across international borders, rampant escalation of federal debt, and systemic ecological dangers unprecedented in human history. To meaningfully address such grave threats to our nation and to planetary prosperity, elected officials must transcend pointing blame and focus instead on solutions. In matters of statecraft, the search for common ground is a moral imperative.
Our mission is to inspire a new generation of leaders as well as those already in power who emphatically reject toxic tribalism and federal failure and who harness the revulsion of potential voters to business-as-usual in Washington.
New Statecraft is a consultancy recently formed to offer pragmatic policy guidance in federal affairs. We favor concrete and mainstream proposals informed by five fundamental objectives: (1) refute tribalism and defeat divisiveness at every opportunity; (2) restore legitimacy and trust in government institutions; (3) eliminate conflicts of interest in legislation and regulation; (4) ensure that incentives are fully aligned with policy priorities; and (5) utilize transparent market processes instead of bureaucratic red tape.

Politics is the art of the possible.
Our policy approach draws wisdom from every person and place it can be found.
This collective intelligence results in work product that assiduously avoids partisan and ideological bias. For example, a proposal that seems more associated with a progressive or conservative viewpoint should be methodically tuned to maximize the likelihood of bipartisan support and eventual enactment. After all, politics is the art of the possible.

The 2024 Presidential election presents unusual challenges.
Although New Statecraft is avowedly moderate and strenuously opposes toxic partisanship, we are equally committed to enhancing legitimacy and trust in government institutions and ensuring that accurate information empowers a truthfully informed — indeed, a sacred — democratic process.
The 2024 Presidential election has subjected every eligible American voter to a scale of deception and fear-mongering that seems unprecedented in our nation's history. As stewards of democracy — and the truth upon which it depends — we feel compelled to refute disinformation campaigns both domestically and globally.
Specifically, America must collectively refute Donald Trump's lies. Most people sympathetic to Trump believe his constant contentions that presidential elections have been stolen by wholesale vote fraud perpetrated by the Democratic Party. The perception of election theft by fraud is a massive advantage for Trump in appealing for his supporters to turn-out in members “too big to rig” and to “swamp the vote.” And there is insufficient awareness among eligible Republican voters of the amazingly impressive array of third-party verifiers that Trump is successfully perpetrating massive disinformation on this subject.
The following are just a small fraction of those who have gone on the record to declare that the 2020 Presidential was not stolen. The complete list of testimonials – including verbatim quotations and citations — can be found HERE.
TRUMP STAFF & ADVISORS
Steve Bannon, William Barr, Johnt Bolton, Ty Cobb, Kellyanne Conway, Richard Donaghue, Jenna Ellis, Mark Esper, Alyssa Farah Griffing, Stephanie Grisham, Alina Habba, Eric Herschman, Cassidy Hutchinson, Gen. John Kelly (ret.), Chris Krebs, Ronna McDaniel, Gen. H.R. McMaster (ret.), Mark Meadows, Gen. Mark Millley (ret.), Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pence, Sidney Powell, Dan Scavino, Bill Stepien, Ivanka Trump, John Yoo
REPUBLICAN OFFICIALS
John Boehner, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Michael Chertoff, Chris Christie, Dan Coates, Wiliam Cohen, John Cornyn, Tom Cotton John Danforth, Ron Desantis, Mike Dewine, Bob Dole, Geoff Duncan, Jeff Flake, Ari Flieischer, Lindsey Graham, Charles Grassley, Nikki Haley, Asa Hutchinson, Jim Jordan, Brian Kemp, Mitch McConnell, Rob Portman, Condoleezza Rice, Tom Ridge, Paul Ryan, Ben Sasse. Tim Scott, John Thune, Pat Toomey
REPUBLICAN INFLUENCERS
Whit Ayres, Guy Benson, Arthur Brooks, John Fund, Ben Ginsberg, Victor David Hanson, Yuval Levin, Frank Luntz, Andy McCarthy, Michael Mukasey, Rupert Murdoch, Peggy Noonan, Henry Olsen, Ramesh Ponnuru, Karl Rove, Jonathan Turley, Peter Wehner
JOURNALISTS & PUNDITS
Bret Baier, Peter Baker, Dan Baltz, Max Boot, David Brooks, Ron Brownstein, Neil Cavuto, Mona Charen, Charlie Cook, Robert Costa, Steve Doocy, David Drucker, David Frum, David Gergen, Paul Gigot, Susan Glasser, Jeffrey Goldberg, Jonah Goldberg, Sean Hannity, Margaret Hoover, David Ignatius, Brian Kilmeade, Howie Kurtz, Martha MacCallum, Chad Pergram, Jennifer Rubin, Gerald Seib, Cal Thomas, Jonathan Turley, Amy Walter, Judy Woodruff, Bob Woodward, Byron York, Fareed Zakaria
MEDIA OUTLETS & INSTITUTIONS
60 Minutes, Associated Press, BBC, Center for Democracy and Technology, The Cook Political Report, The Economist, Facebook, The Fact Checker, Fox News, National Academy of Sciences, National Council on Election Integrity, National Review, New York Post, Time Magazine, True the Vote, Wall Street Journal Editorial Page, Washington Times, Yahoo.com
ALL FOUR LIVING EX-PRESIDENTS
George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama
The Combating Disinformation page contains an impressive array of testimonials from widely respected public officials, academics, journalists, and third-party verifiers that establish definitively and indisputably to any honest eligible American voter sympathetic to Trump that the winner of the 2020 American Presidential election was not determined by vote fraud, a question of overarching importance in determining whether disinformation or truth will be victorious in America and globally.
Readers should understand that this results from statements seen from a single person’s media consumption mix. An organized effort to grow the list could expand this list exponentially. For example, the list includes almost no world public broadcasters, who are widely respected in those societies as avoiding disinformation, like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Agence France Press, Le Matin, Le Monde, and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. And these international broadcasters, and the planet’s leading newspapers, agree that Trump’s election conspiracy theories are all lies. Even many leading newspapers on the right do not write that the American presidential election of 2020 was stolen through fraud by the Democratic Party, or that the 2024 presidential election might be stolen through fraud either. All of these should eventually be added as verifiers.
The full list disproportionately features those with conservative and Republican backgrounds. The list documents statements by the most broadly respected public officials, leaders from think tanks, reporters, conservative columnists, widely respected professors of government and law, and third-party verifiers from the states and counties where Trump contends that fraud was perpetrated.
The list includes source citations and definitive verbatim language to facilitate immediate corroboration of statements. It is alphabetical by name and/or organization/institution or state or county where Trump contends fraud, to facilitate easy research and search capability.
We invite committed organizations and individuals to expand the list to include the innumerable other existing statements, particularly valuable in a swing state. The power of these statements can be magnified by embedding the original audio or video recordings. It will be particularly valuable to add current and former local and state officials. The voices of one’s own local or state Republican elected representative from down the street will be peculiarly persuasive to every honest eligible voter sympathetic to Trump.
Please forward this link to all of your friends and colleagues, including those who are considering a vote for Trump! Or paste it into an email to everyone you can think of!
Again, the full list can be found HERE.

BOLDER ANSWERS, a blog by Dr. Thomas O'Brien
Dr. O’Brien is an Institute Co-Founder who reluctantly leaves a unifying inclination here to call out the unique threat of disinformation America faces in 2024. Dr. O’Brien was the co-founding Director for Research at Horizon Institute for Policy Solutions from 1990 to 2000. The Institute was committed to socioeconomic justice but also to harness market mechanisms to minimize bureaucratic regulation. Dr. O’Brien’s work was published extensively in the world’s leading periodicals, like the Economist, The Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, among many others.
The sentiments here are exclusively his own and do not represent those of New Statecraft, and are in fact a departure from the general spirit of unification that New Statecraft hopes to husband in coming years. This departure is presented only to respond to the unusual threat posed by the disinformation campaign. We offer no criticisms of former President Trump’s policy assertions here.
This temporary blog identifies the fatal flaws with the Kamala Harris campaign that have prevented her from winning this election by large margins.
It is clear from voter registration in the swing states and voter statements in public opinion research that Kamala Harris is well on the way to losing the presidential election to Donald Trump. Every expert on the planet argues that this election is a toss-up, and anyone’s guess in a 50-50 election. Yet even at this late date, Ms. Harris can make the bolder changes in her campaign to DECISIVELY win the election by presenting more major substantive reforms and inspire the tens of millions of nonvoters to take the trivial effort to vote on who will govern the nation for the next four years.
Some of Dr. O'Brien's most recent posts appear immediately below. However a full catalog of his posts to the Bolder Answers Blog can be viewed HERE.
The Most Important Question: Increasing Divisiveness
The objective to divide the nation even more is the most important issue. No matter how bad Kamala Harris is, with heavy Republican presence in Congress, there is no doubt that conservativism will be successfully protected in law for the next four years.
No one can dispute that Harris would be less divisive than Trump, or that a Harris administration would be less divisive than a Trump administration.
The human race is threatened by weaponized disinformation worldwide. At the dawn of AI, with information war across sovereign borders aimed at destroying democratic governments, with unremitting propaganda and contempt, these threats will grow more diabolical by an order of magnitude. We cannot permit an agent of the disinformation vector to tear the nation further apart than it already is. It is hard to even imagine what a further divided society might look like, but a Trump victory would guarantee that result.
Conservatives: Have No Fear!
Kamala Harris is at least HARMLESS because Republican chairs of every committee and majorities in at least one chamber will certainly prevent and cabin every intention to enact any progressive legislative attempts. 50+ Republican senators are a bulwark certain to make any radical progressive agenda dead on arrival.
For example, there is zero chance that the Republican senate will enact any ban on black arms, military-style guns. There is zero chance that you can get the votes to restore Roe v. Wade in full detail. Harris is relatively harmless because of the Senate and also huge numbers of Republican members of the House of Representatives also.
Take Far Bolder Actions on Chronic Problems
She should FORCE Congress to act on the problems that every American agrees need to be fixed. She should veto the HHS appropriations bill until Congress acts to finally fix Social Security. Force the committees of jurisdiction to stay in negotiations at least five days a week if not more until they reach a big majority to finally fix this. She can allow a temporary appropriations bill for one week at a time as long as these committees remain in continuous negotiations. Let Congress agree to any mix of tax increases or benefits reductions or adjustments. But require that Congress finally make this action.
Force Congress to reduce the tax code. She can veto any IRS appropriations bill until the committees of jurisdictions reduce the insanely complex tax code that EVERY tax economist agrees is stupid beyond description. Allow a temporary appropriations funding one week at a time as long as the committees remain in continuous negotiation to cut the size of the tax code by 20% in phased-in simplification. She can agree to accept ANY changes Congress chooses, but the tax code needs to be simplified MASSIVELY. EVERYONE agrees that this should be done, Democrats and independents. Yet no president has promised to fix it.
Similarly, she should fix the massive explosion of federal debt. All economists left and right are in agreement that the failure by Congress to make the hard decisions is remarkably irresponsible. She should veto any federal budget that does not put these massive deficits on a path to quick elimination. Congress fails to make the unpopular decisions that are necessary to balance our federal budget. She should allow a temporary week-by-week funding of the federal government as long as the budget and appropriations committees remain in continuous negotiations to fix the budget at least five days a week. She can let Congress choose any mix of spending cuts in any area and tax revenue increases in any areas (cut defense spending, cut any other funding, and close any tax loopholes it chooses or raise taxes it chooses (tax gasoline and poisons, etc.)
Merits of a Bipartisan Cabinet to Unify America
Her Cabinet needs to be AT LEAST 50% Republican. Now the Hobson's choice America is facing is: "100% Republican Cabinet" (Stephen Miller, Jim Jordan, Devon Nunes, John Ratcliffe, John Eastland, Chaffetz, Kash Patel) or a 90% Democratic Cabinet. To unify this nation faithfully, we need a Cabinet at least 50% Republican under a Democratic president. A single Republican does not unify 100% of this society.
Promise a Limited Pardon of Trump
Trump faces many state as well as federal criminal charges (tax fraud, elections fraud charges by the state of Georgia, federal charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election results by inciting a bloody coup, charges on retaining classified government documents that he refused to turn over, payments to Stephanie Cliffords to remain silent on sex affair. Many conservative voters understandably feel that many of these charges may be motivated by partisan concern only. Harris can leave many of these charges standing, but assuring all conservative voters that her Department of Justice will not be weaponized for political purposes would reassure them that her administration will not be unduly vindictive. She can encourage with strong rhetoric Georgia to drop the charges of election fraud and promise to drop the federal charges of inciting violence in the Capitol building. These issues have been very well aired and Mr. Trump has paid a very high price emotionally as well as in other ways, including financially for attorneys’ fees. Unifying the nation by dropping certain federal charges will serve the nation’s future. She can leave the sex attack and the flagrant tax fraud cases standing. All conservative voters will be happy to hear that we can move beyond these matters for the future best interests of the nation.
————
DISCLAIMER: The sentiments presented above are exclusively those of Dr. Thomas O'Brien and do not necessarily represent or coincide with those of New Statecraft.
For more information please email hello@newstatecraft.org.
Also please follow us on X, Blue Sky, or Facebook (links below) for periodic updates and alerts. Thanks!